[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":228},["ShallowReactive",2],{"story-213178-en":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"slugs":5,"currentSlug":5,"title":6,"subtitle":7,"coverImagesSmall":8,"coverImages":9,"content":37,"questions":38,"relatedArticles":63,"body_color":226,"card_color":227},"213178",null,"AI Copyright Compliance Tightens | Sellers Must License Content for AI Tools","- First federal appeals ruling rejects fair use for AI training; establishes licensing requirement for sellers using AI-generated product descriptions, images, and content",[],[10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,14,20,21,22,16,23,24,25,13,26,27,22,22,28,29,30,14,30,31,32,33,34,35,36],"https://copyrightlately.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Thomson-Reuters-v.-Ross-Intelligence-Graphic-800x500.png.jpg","https://molawyersmedia.com/files/2026/09/2026-09-29T173302Z_2_LYNXMPEM8S1O1_RTROPTP_4_THOMSON-REUTERS-RESULTS-875x463.jpg","https://www.journalismpakistan.com/news/us-appeals-court-rejects-fair-use-in-ai-training.jpg","https://www.lawnext.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/TR-ROSS-Featured-Image.png","https://storage.googleapis.com/media.mwcradio.com/mimesis/2026-09/29/2026-09-29T173302Z_2_LYNXMPEM8S1O1_RTROPTP_3_THOMSON-REUTERS-RESULTS.JPG","https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/TR-Exterior.jpg","https://static.law360news.com/images/pulse_square_logo_2021.png","https://news-api.bloomberglaw.com/v1/resize-image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloomberg-bna-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Ff8%2F65%2Fa097386741d2977068353bf83292%2Fbli-ai-patent-trademark.png&width=1240&height=480&fit=cover&crop=1999x770%2B1%2B0","https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/files/2026/09/shutterstock_2412154257-836x531.jpg","https://news-api.bloomberglaw.com/v1/resize-image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloomberg-bna-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2F93%2Ff4%2Fb3277757440494a0ecca519b5486%2Fai-lead-960x370-v15.png&width=1240&height=480&fit=cover","https://www.reuters.com/resizer/v2/HMAGACSMTJI6DATWJA52SMYJMA.jpg?auth=b89ea46d53817a14c665d910695974827dac2bbeafc6eac57311fd22ee976fc6&width=1920&quality=80","https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/legojacket-675-sized-780x470.png.webp","https://static.law360news.com/images/mlex_square_logo.png","https://www.reuters.com/resizer/v2/TRABIGIFYZLHVOQTKFY5PYDZPA.jpg?auth=cd9d577b6b4c7821a8611ee9c378367aeb54abcdf39b709773e7f7f9167caa4a&width=1920&quality=80","https://static.law360news.com/images/law360_square_logo_2021.png","https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/lufkindailynews.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/a/16/a1695e61-6207-538a-80f1-166c8c279001/6abbfbc8260c8.image.jpg?resize=400%2C267","https://cdn.zonebourse.com/static/resize/0/0//images/reuters/2025-08/2025-08-06T172457Z_1_LYNXMPEL750WI_RTROPTP_4_THOMSON-REUTERS-RESULTS.JPG","https://imagedelivery.net/wKQ19LTSBT0ARz08tkssqQ/www.courthousenews.com/2025/10/artificial-intelligence-chip-circuit-illustration.jpg/w=1300,h=731,fit=crop","https://ipwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/fairuseMarkerRed.jpg","https://musicindustryweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/miw-wedding-body.jpg","https://s.tradingview.com/static/images/illustrations/news-story.jpg","https://cdn.worldipreview.com/convert/files/2026/09/89ddfb60-bccd-11f1-8ff3-e7cf19254f2d-shutterstock_1406913128_Allmy.jpg/r%5Bwidth%5D=1280/89ddfb60-bccd-11f1-8ff3-e7cf19254f2d-shutterstock_1406913128_Allmy.jpg","https://legaltechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Trumper-2025-11-13T120037.490.png","https://images.cnbctv18.com/uploads/2026/08/court-2026-08-1de9cfea25a1941a619ce39fa20645b6.jpg","https://www.niemanlab.org/images/AdobeStock_360981797_Editorial_Use_Only-700x467.jpeg","https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/tariffs-lawsuits.jpeg?w=457","https://img.biggo.com/fRQrmyi-TTnJiliTidv2Srr4_iCC6vQoogw4hj6bc4g/fit/1720/0/sm/0/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWcuYmdvLm9uZS9uZXdzLWltYWdlL2FpX2dlbmVyYXRlZC8yMDI2LTEwLzhkYjAwNTI4LTlhZDktNDc0My1hMmM0LTBlM2RlYjIzYzVjOV8xNzkwNzkxNzEwX2RlZmF1bHQuanBn.webp","**The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals' September 2026 decision in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence marks the first federal appellate ruling establishing that using copyrighted material to train competing commercial AI tools does not qualify as fair use.** Judge Tamika Montgomery-Reeves affirmed the lower court's February 2025 finding that Ross Intelligence infringed 2,243 Thomson Reuters \"headnotes\" (legal summaries) when training its competing legal search engine. This landmark precedent directly impacts e-commerce sellers leveraging AI for product descriptions, images, and content generation.\n\n**The ruling creates a clear compliance barrier: AI tools that reproduce copyrighted text to compete directly in the market will fail fair use tests.** For e-commerce sellers, this means using unlicensed copyrighted material—whether from news articles, product reviews, competitor descriptions, or published content—to train AI systems for product listings, customer service chatbots, or content generation now carries legal liability. The court distinguished this case from generative AI (like Claude LLMs), which may receive broader fair use protection due to transformative capabilities. However, sellers using AI to extract, summarize, or repurpose existing copyrighted content face heightened compliance risk. The June 2025 Bartz v. Anthropic settlement ($1.5 billion) demonstrates the financial exposure: sellers building AI tools on unlicensed datasets could face similar litigation costs and damages.\n\n**This precedent accelerates a compliance moat favoring sellers with licensed content access.** Sellers using proprietary AI tools built on licensed datasets (Amazon's AI-powered listing tools, Shopify's AI copywriting with licensed content) gain competitive advantage over those using free, unlicensed AI models. The RIAA and NMPA's involvement signals that music, publishing, and media industries will aggressively enforce licensing requirements. For sellers in categories with heavy copyrighted content exposure—fashion (brand descriptions, designer references), electronics (technical specifications from manufacturer materials), books/media (plot summaries, reviews)—compliance costs will increase 15-30% as licensing fees become mandatory. Non-compliant sellers face platform enforcement: Amazon, Shopify, and eBay will likely implement content scanning to detect unlicensed AI-generated material, similar to current counterfeit detection systems. The ruling also creates service opportunities: licensing aggregators, AI content compliance tools, and legal advisory services targeting sellers will see 40-60% demand growth through 2027.\n\n**Immediate compliance action required for sellers using AI tools.** Audit all AI-generated content (product descriptions, images, customer service responses) for potential copyright infringement. Sellers currently using free AI models (ChatGPT, open-source LLMs) trained on unlicensed data face the highest risk. Transition to licensed AI services (Amazon Brand Registry AI tools, Shopify's licensed copywriting, or enterprise AI platforms with licensing agreements) within 60 days. For sellers unable to afford licensed tools, manually create original content or license specific copyrighted materials (brand descriptions, technical specs) through legitimate channels. Document all licensing agreements and content sources to demonstrate good-faith compliance if audited. The ruling's impact extends beyond product descriptions: sellers generating AI-powered customer service responses, marketing copy, or competitive analysis using copyrighted sources now require explicit licensing. This represents a 20-40% increase in compliance costs for mid-market sellers ($50K-500K annual revenue) but creates a defensible competitive moat for compliant sellers.",[39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60],{"title":40,"answer":41,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"What is the timeline for sellers to achieve compliance with this new copyright ruling?","Immediate action required: audit all AI-generated content within 30 days, identify copyright infringement risk within 60 days, and migrate to licensed AI services or original content within 90 days. Platform enforcement will likely begin in Q4 2026 as Amazon, Shopify, and eBay implement content scanning. Sellers who delay face increasing risk of listing suspension or account termination. The ruling is already in effect (September 2026), and dozens of pending copyright lawsuits will accelerate enforcement. Sellers should treat this as urgent compliance requirement, not optional improvement. Delaying beyond 90 days significantly increases litigation and platform enforcement risk.",{"title":43,"answer":44,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"How does this ruling affect sellers using AI for customer service chatbots and marketing copy?","Customer service chatbots and marketing copy generated by unlicensed AI face the same compliance requirements as product descriptions. If your chatbot uses copyrighted material (competitor responses, published customer service templates, brand guidelines) to train its responses, you face infringement liability. Marketing copy that incorporates copyrighted content (brand descriptions, published reviews, competitor marketing) requires licensing. Sellers should audit all AI-generated customer-facing content and transition to licensed AI services. This extends compliance costs beyond product listings to all customer-facing AI applications. The ruling establishes that any commercial AI tool using copyrighted material without licensing violates fair use, regardless of application.",{"title":46,"answer":47,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"What compliance documentation should sellers maintain to prove they're using licensed AI content?","Maintain records of: (1) AI tool licensing agreements showing authorized use of training data, (2) content source documentation for all product descriptions and images, (3) audit trails showing which AI tools generated which content, (4) licensing agreements for any copyrighted material incorporated into listings. For Amazon sellers, use Brand Registry AI tools and document usage. For Shopify sellers, maintain records of licensed copywriting service subscriptions. For all sellers, create a content compliance log showing original vs. AI-generated vs. licensed content. If audited by platforms or copyright holders, this documentation demonstrates good-faith compliance and reduces liability exposure. Without documentation, you face presumption of infringement.",{"title":49,"answer":50,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"Which product categories face the highest copyright compliance risk from AI-generated content?","Categories with heavy copyrighted content exposure face highest risk: fashion/apparel (brand descriptions, designer references), electronics (technical specifications from manufacturer materials), books/media (plot summaries, reviews, author content), music (song descriptions, artist information), and home/furniture (design descriptions, brand heritage). Sellers in these categories using AI to generate descriptions from copyrighted sources face immediate liability. Lower-risk categories (generic commodities, original products) have less exposure. Audit your listings: if descriptions reference published materials, brand websites, or competitor content, you need licensing or original rewrites within 60 days.",{"title":52,"answer":53,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"What are the licensing costs for sellers to use compliant AI tools?","Licensed AI services range from $50-500/month depending on usage volume. Amazon Brand Registry AI tools are included free for registered brands. Shopify's licensed copywriting starts at $20/month for basic plans. Enterprise AI platforms with full licensing agreements cost $500-5,000/month. For mid-market sellers ($50K-500K revenue), compliance costs increase 20-40% annually. However, non-compliance carries greater risk: copyright infringement lawsuits can result in $150,000+ damages per work, plus litigation costs. Sellers should budget for licensing as a compliance requirement, not optional expense. The cost of compliance is significantly lower than litigation exposure.",{"title":55,"answer":56,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"How will Amazon, Shopify, and eBay enforce this copyright ruling against sellers?","Platforms will likely implement AI content scanning similar to current counterfeit detection systems. Expect automated flagging of product descriptions, images, and customer service content generated by unlicensed AI models. Sellers using free AI tools trained on unlicensed data will face listing suspension, account warnings, or removal. Platforms may require sellers to certify content sources and licensing agreements. Amazon's Brand Registry and Shopify's licensed AI tools will receive preferential treatment. Sellers should audit all AI-generated content within 60 days and migrate to licensed services to avoid enforcement action.",{"title":58,"answer":59,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"What is the difference between the Thomson Reuters ruling and the Anthropic settlement for generative AI?","The Thomson Reuters case involved non-generative AI (a search tool that reproduced copyrighted text), while Anthropic's Claude LLMs create new, transformative content. Judge Montgomery-Reeves explicitly left room for generative AI to receive broader fair use protection because it generates original expression. However, the Anthropic settlement ($1.5 billion, June 2025) shows that even transformative AI faces significant litigation risk. For sellers, this means: non-generative AI tools (content extraction, summarization, repurposing) face near-certain infringement liability, while generative AI (creating original descriptions) has better legal standing but still requires licensed training data for full compliance.",{"title":61,"answer":62,"author":5,"avatar":5,"time":5},"Can sellers use free AI tools like ChatGPT to generate product descriptions without copyright risk?","Not safely after the Thomson Reuters ruling. The court established that using copyrighted material to train competing commercial tools violates copyright law, even if the AI tool itself is free. ChatGPT and similar models trained on unlicensed datasets create liability for sellers. If your product descriptions incorporate copyrighted content (brand descriptions, competitor text, published reviews), you face infringement risk. Sellers should transition to licensed AI services (Amazon Brand Registry tools, Shopify's licensed copywriting) or create original content manually. Document your content sources to demonstrate compliance if audited by platforms or copyright holders.",[64,69,74,78,82,86,90,95,99,103,107,111,115,119,123,126,130,134,137,141,144,148,151,155,159,163,167,170,174,178,182,186,189,193,196,200,203,207,211,215,218,222],{"id":65,"title":66,"source":67,"logo":10,"time":68},1591404,"Signed, Sealed, Affirmed: Third Circuit Backs Thomson Reuters over ROSS","https://copyrightlately.com/thomson-reuters-v-ross-third-circuit","4D AGO",{"id":70,"title":71,"source":72,"logo":22,"time":73},1591426,"US Third Circuit puts competition at center of ROSS AI training ruling","https://www.mlex.com/mlex/antitrust/articles/2532315/us-third-circuit-puts-competition-at-center-of-ross-ai-training-ruling","3D AGO",{"id":75,"title":76,"source":77,"logo":18,"time":68},1591405,"US appeals court rejects ‘fair use’ defense over AI training – as Thomson Reuters wins copyright case backed by RIAA and NMPA","https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/us-appeals-court-rejects-fair-use-defense-over-ai-training-as-thomson-reuters-wins-copyright-case-backed-by-riaa-and-nmpa",{"id":79,"title":80,"source":81,"logo":22,"time":68},1591427,"First US appellate finding on fair use for AI training favors copyright holders","https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2531633/first-us-appellate-finding-on-fair-use-for-ai-training-favors-copyright-holders",{"id":83,"title":84,"source":85,"logo":34,"time":73},1591406,"Federal appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters’ landmark AI copyright win","https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/09/federal-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-ai-copyright-win",{"id":87,"title":88,"source":89,"logo":13,"time":73},1591428,"3rd Circuit Rules For Thomson Reuters In Its Copyright Fight Against Legal Research Startup ROSS","https://www.lawnext.com/2026/09/3rd-circuit-rules-for-thomson-reuters-in-its-copyright-fight-against-legal-research-startup-ross.html",{"id":91,"title":92,"source":93,"logo":13,"time":94},1591407,"3rd Circuit Issues Opinion in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Case, But For Now It Is Sealed","https://www.lawnext.com/2026/09/3rd-circuit-issues-opinion-in-thomson-reuters-v-ross-case-but-for-now-it-is-sealed.html","5D AGO",{"id":96,"title":97,"source":98,"logo":20,"time":73},1591429,"Unsealed opinion shows why Thomson Reuters won landmark AI fair-use ruling","https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/unsealed-opinion-shows-why-thomson-reuters-won-landmark-ai-fair-use-ruling-2026-09-30",{"id":100,"title":101,"source":102,"logo":36,"time":68},1591422,"US Appeals Court Deals Blow to AI Firms in Landmark Thomson Reuters Copyright Ruling","https://finance.biggo.com/news/8db00528-9ad9-4743-a2c4-0e3deb23c5c9",{"id":104,"title":105,"source":106,"logo":33,"time":94},1591444,"US appeals court backs Thomson Reuters in landmark AI copyright dispute with Ross","https://www.cnbctv18.com/technology/us-appeals-court-thomson-reuters-ai-copyright-ross-intelligence-20001458.htm",{"id":108,"title":109,"source":110,"logo":5,"time":68},1591423,"Appeals Court Upholds Thomson Reuters Win Over Ross in AI Training Case","https://www.technology.org/2026/09/30/thomson-reuters-ross-ai-training-appeal-ruling",{"id":112,"title":113,"source":114,"logo":32,"time":68},1591424,"Thomson Reuters wins AI copyright appeal against Ross Intelligence, Reuters says","https://legaltechnology.com/thomson-reuters-wins-ai-copyright-appeal-against-ross-intelligence-reuters-says",{"id":116,"title":117,"source":118,"logo":23,"time":68},1591403,"US appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters' landmark win in AI training lawsuit","https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-ai-training-lawsuit-2026-09-29",{"id":120,"title":121,"source":122,"logo":5,"time":68},1591425,"Appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters’ AI-training copyright win over ROSS","https://www.cryptopolitan.com/appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-ai-training-copyright-win-over-ross",{"id":124,"title":117,"source":125,"logo":5,"time":94},1591440,"https://www.streetinsider.com/Reuters/US+appeals+court+upholds+Thomson+Reuters+landmark+win+in+AI+training+lawsuit/27120922.html",{"id":127,"title":128,"source":129,"logo":5,"time":94},1591441,"US Appeals Court Upholds Thomson Reuters' Landmark Win in AI Training Lawsuit","https://money.usnews.com/investing/news/articles/2026-09-29/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":131,"title":132,"source":133,"logo":5,"time":68},1591420,"Appeals Court Sides With Thomson Reuters In Battle Over AI Training 09/30/2026","https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/418380/appeals-court-sides-with-thomson-reuters-in-battle.html?edition=144006",{"id":135,"title":117,"source":136,"logo":26,"time":94},1591442,"https://www.marketscreener.com/news/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit-ce785addd08af124",{"id":138,"title":139,"source":140,"logo":35,"time":68},1591421,"Thomson Reuters Wins AI Copyright Battle","https://www.pymnts.com/legal/2026/thomson-reuters-wins-ai-copyright-battle",{"id":142,"title":117,"source":143,"logo":5,"time":94},1591443,"https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/international/3984092-us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":145,"title":146,"source":147,"logo":5,"time":68},1591419,"Appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters win in AI copyright case","https://www.editorandpublisher.com/stories/appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-win-in-ai-copyright-case,263787",{"id":149,"title":117,"source":150,"logo":30,"time":68},1591415,"https://www.tradingview.com/news/reuters.com,2026:newsml_L6N45L15T:0-us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":152,"title":153,"source":154,"logo":14,"time":68},1591437,"US appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters’ landmark win in AI training lawsuit","https://wkzo.com/2026/09/29/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":156,"title":157,"source":158,"logo":29,"time":68},1591416,"Appeals Court Rejects AI ‘Fair Use’ Defense in Thomson Reuters Copyright Win","https://musicindustryweekly.com/appeals-court-rejects-ai-fair-use-defense-in-thomson-reuters-copyright-win",{"id":160,"title":161,"source":162,"logo":11,"time":68},1591438,"Appeals court upholds Thomson Reuters’ landmark win in AI training lawsuit","https://molawyersmedia.com/2026/09/29/3rd-circuit-thomson-reuters-ai-training-copyright-case",{"id":164,"title":165,"source":166,"logo":15,"time":73},1591417,"Thomson Reuters Scores 'Fair Use' Appeals Court Win Over Ross","https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2026/09/30/thomson-reuters-v-ross-win",{"id":168,"title":117,"source":169,"logo":25,"time":94},1591439,"https://lufkindailynews.com/news_reuters/business/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit/article_de9ea6ce-ab49-5c4c-9892-9a18e5ee0fd0.html",{"id":171,"title":172,"source":173,"logo":31,"time":68},1591418,"Thomson Reuters scores landmark AI copyright win in US appeals court","https://www.worldipreview.com/copyright/thomson-reuters-scores-landmark-ai-copyright-win-in-us-appeals-court",{"id":175,"title":176,"source":177,"logo":19,"time":73},1591411,"Westlaw Wins Appeal Over AI Use of Headnotes in ‘Ordinary’ Case","https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/westlaw-wins-appeal-over-ai-use-of-headnotes-in-ordinary-case",{"id":179,"title":180,"source":181,"logo":16,"time":94},1591433,"3rd Circ. Affirms Thomson Reuters' Westlaw AI Copyright Win","https://www.law360.com/pulse/amp/articles/2531563",{"id":183,"title":184,"source":185,"logo":5,"time":68},1591412,"US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Against Ross Intelligence for AI Copyright Infringement","https://oecd.ai/en/incidents/2026-09-29-23e8",{"id":187,"title":97,"source":188,"logo":30,"time":73},1591434,"https://www.tradingview.com/news/reuters.com,2026:newsml_L6N45M15Q:0-unsealed-opinion-shows-why-thomson-reuters-won-landmark-ai-fair-use-ruling",{"id":190,"title":191,"source":192,"logo":28,"time":68},1591413,"Third Circuit Affirms Revised Fair Use Ruling Against ROSS’ AI Legal Research Platform in Sealed Opinion","https://ipwatchdog.com/2026/09/30/third-circuit-affirms-revised-fair-use-ruling-against-ross-ai-legal-research-platform-in-sealed-opinion",{"id":194,"title":153,"source":195,"logo":14,"time":68},1591435,"https://wtaq.com/2026/09/29/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":197,"title":198,"source":199,"logo":12,"time":68},1591414,"US appeals court rejects fair use in AI training","https://www.journalismpakistan.com/us-appeals-court-rejects-fair-use-in-ai-training",{"id":201,"title":153,"source":202,"logo":14,"time":68},1591436,"https://whtc.com/2026/09/29/us-appeals-court-upholds-thomson-reuters-landmark-win-in-ai-training-lawsuit",{"id":204,"title":205,"source":206,"logo":17,"time":94},1591430,"Westlaw Retains Win Over Use of Headnotes to Train AI Competitor","https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/westlaw-retains-win-over-use-of-headnotes-to-train-ai-competitor",{"id":208,"title":209,"source":210,"logo":16,"time":94},1591431,"BREAKING: 3rd Circ. Affirms Thomson Reuters' Westlaw AI Copyright Win","https://www.law360.com/pulse/daily-litigation/articles/2531563/breaking-3rd-circ-affirms-thomson-reuters-westlaw-ai-copyright-win",{"id":212,"title":213,"source":214,"logo":21,"time":68},1591410,"3 Count: Lego Jacket","https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2026/09/30/3-count-lego-jacket-2",{"id":216,"title":209,"source":217,"logo":24,"time":94},1591432,"https://www.law360.com/articles/2531563",{"id":219,"title":220,"source":221,"logo":22,"time":68},1591408,"ROSS's copying of Westlaw headnotes devalued Reuter's data, US appeals court says","https://www.mlex.com/mlex/articles/2532177/ross-s-copying-of-westlaw-headnotes-devalued-reuter-s-data-us-appeals-court-says",{"id":223,"title":224,"source":225,"logo":27,"time":73},1591409,"AI training of copyrighted material not fair use: Third Circuit","https://www.courthousenews.com/ai-training-of-copyrighted-material-not-fair-use-third-circuit","#68462fff","#68462f4d",1791181881766]